Print Page | Contact Us | Sign In | Join RVCF
RVCF Link
Blog Home All Blogs
RVCF LINK focuses on the challenges and trends relevant to today's changing retail landscape. Our newsletter contains case studies, articles of note, and original content regarding collaborative initiatives, research, and training occurring in the world of RVCF.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: Omni-Channel  e-commerce  Inventory Management  3PL  Collaboration  Kaizen  Vendor Compliance  Amazon  Brick-and-Mortar  RVCF Fall Conference 2015  RVCF Fall Conference 2016  supply chain  Chargeback  EDI  Onboarding  Shortages  Chargebacks  Compliance Management  Holiday 2014  RVCF Conferences  RVCF Membership  Tariff  Audit  CBP  Economic Sanctions  exports  Holiday 2015  Imports  NAFTA  Ports 

U.S. Issues Advisory on Sanctions Risks Involving North Korea (July 23, 2018)

Posted By RCVF Admin, Saturday, August 4, 2018
Updated: Saturday, August 4, 2018



U.S. Issues Advisory on Sanctions Risks Involving North Korea (July 23, 2018)

 By Melissa Proctor (Miller Proctor Law PLLC)

 

On July 23, 2018, the U.S. Departments of State, Treasury and Homeland Security issued an advisory that warns companies of the tactics used by North Korea to evade U.S. and United Nations economic sanctions. The advisory does not impose any new sanctions on North Korea. Rather, the sanctions on North Korea remains fully in effect. The advisory merely provides examples of how North Korea is attempting to evade existing sanctions, and draws attention to the risks of inadvertent sourcing and purchasing of goods, service and technology from North Korea.[1] In many cases, U.S. companies are wholly unaware of North Korea’s involvement in their overseas transactions.

 

For example, third-country suppliers are known to have moved their manufacturing operations (or have subcontracted portions of their production processes) to factories in North Korea without notifying their customers. In addition, North Korean companies often place false country of origin labels on goods that were produced in North Korea. The advisory also notes that North Korean companies have entered into joint ventures with entities located in other countries—the involvement of North Korea in those entities are not readily apparent to many multinational companies in industry sectors that include seafood, consumer electronics, minerals and precious metals, textiles and apparel, and construction, among others. (A list of the known joint ventures are identified in Annex 2 of the advisory.) Further, companies in North Korea are known to sell their products far below market prices, making them very attractive to middlemen and trading companies.

 

The advisory also points to the use of North Korean labor in international supply chains—where North Korean nationals have been loaned out by the North Korean government to manufacturers located throughout Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and even South America. Based on a report issued by Military.com earlier this year, it is estimated that approximately 200,000 North Koreans are being used as slave labor in over 45 countries around the world, and that the North Korean government earns an estimated $3 billion annually for supplying slave labor to these countries. All of the wages earned by the workers are paid directly to the North Korean government or to companies controlled by the North Korean government. The average wage for a North Korean worker, payable to the North Korean government, is reportedly around $400 per month; however, the workers receive only 10% to 20% of that total amount. The export of slave labor is in addition to the forced labor taking place in the numerous prison labor camps inside North Korea.[2] Affected industries include seafood processing, shipbuilding, medical and pharmaceutical, textile apparel and footwear, IT, and the restaurant and hospitality industries.


1. Current Sanctions on North Korea

 

By way of background, the Foreign Assets Control Regulations,[3] which are enforced by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) prohibit virtually all dealings by U.S. persons with North Korea. The U.S. Customs Regulations also prohibit the importation of North Korean-originating goods into the United States—specifically, imported merchandise that contains any amount of North Korean content is prohibited from entering the United States. CBP has also long had the authority to deny entry into the United States of merchandise produced, in whole or in part, by prison, forced, child or indentured labor under the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. Section 1307). The Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act (“TFTEA”),[4] which was enacted in 2016, further solidified CBP’s enforcement authority in this area. CBP is authorized to deny the entry of imported goods into the United States where there is evidence that they were produced by forced labor—but the burden was placed on CBP to prove that forced labor was in fact involved in the manufacture of imported goods.

 

The Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (“CAATSA”),[5] however, changed the rules of the game. CBP continues to refuse the entry of imported merchandise into the United States where it is believed to have been produced with forced labor, but the burden of proof now falls on the U.S. importers to show by clear and convincing evidence that North Korean forced labor was not used. If there is evidence of North Korean labor, CBP may detain and seize the imported goods, subject the goods to forfeiture, assess civil penalties, and may even refer the issue to Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations (“HSI”) for criminal investigation. U.S. importers caught up in a violation of CAATSA should expect to have their future import shipments scrutinized by CBP to a much greater degree, such as through increased examinations and detentions. And of course, violators will likely suffer negative publicity as a result of the violations.

 

2. Previous Guidance Issued on North Korea’s Deceptive Practices & U.S. Enforcement

 

Earlier this year, OFAC issued guidance on the various deceptive shipping practices employed by North Korea. For example, North Korea is known to physically alter the names and International Maritime Organization (“IMO”) number of vessels passing themselves off as different vessels. North Korea has also transferred cargo from one ship to another while at sea rather than while located a port, thereby concealing the origin or destination of the cargo. North Korea has also falsified vessel and cargo documents to obscure the origin or destination of cargo, as well as disabled the Automatic Identification System (“AIS”), a vessel’s collision avoidance system, to mask their movements.

 

We also previously reported that CBP had begun scrutinizing import shipments suspected of being made with North Korean forced labor, as directed by CAATSA. For example, CBP has detained and seized shipments from China, and has requested information and documentation from U.S. Importers through the issuance of CF-28s. The documents and records that may be requested by CBP as part of a CF-28 inquiry may include certificates of origin, supplier certifications stating that no forced labor was used, foreign supplier daily production records (including subcontractor production records), finishing and packing records, employee timecards and wage records, employee lists, purchase orders and delivery documents for raw materials, inputs and components used, inventory records, bills of material, commercial invoices, packing lists, proof of payment, factory visit reports and photographs, inline and final inspection reports, factory utility bills and payment, etc.  At the same time, CBP encourages parties, who have information about the use of North Korean or forced labor with respect to imported merchandise, to submit information via its online eAllegation portal—parties who provide tips that lead to the recovery of a penalty, fine, or the forfeiture of violative merchandise may be eligible to receive compensation of up to $250,000.

 

3. Advisory Urges Due Diligence and Awareness of North Korean Tactics


The advisory reinforces the need for companies with multinational operations to make themselves aware of the deceptive practices described above, and to implement due diligence policies and procedures to prevent inadvertent dealings with North Korea that violate U.S. sanctions laws and regulations. Companies should first and foremost ensure that they are screening all supply chain parties and those involved in international activities against the U.S. restricted parties lists, the restrictive measures imposed by the European Union, and other applicable country sanctions lists. Companies should also review the list of joint ventures involving North Korean entities provided in Annex 2 to the advisory.

 

In addition, to assist U.S. companies in their increased supply chain due diligence efforts, CBP previously published guidance on its website recommending the adoption of additional internal controls for compliance and updated its Reasonable Care Checklist. CBP recommends that U.S. importers—

 

  • Fully understand the sourcing, manufacturing and finishing processes for their imported goods, all of the companies involved, where exactly such operations are performed, and the labor conditions that exist in each of the production facilities:
  •  Review the information contained on CBP’s website relating to Forced Labor, such as fact sheets and recent investigations conducted by CBP;
  •  Review the U.S. Labor Department’s “List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor” and “Reducing Child Labor and Forced Labor Toolkit,” as well as the International Labor Organization’s (“ILO’s”) publication “Indicators of Forced Labour,” with respect to high-risk countries, high-risk commodities, and red flags;
  •  Perform regular risk assessments and internal audits of their supply chains to confirm that their imported goods are both “forced labor free” and “North Korea free”;
  •  Implement a formal, robust process for vetting foreign suppliers and vendors in high-risk areas, and incorporate prohibitions against the use of forced labor in purchase order terms and conditions, supplier agreements and codes of conduct; and,
  • Implementation of a formal social corporate responsibility compliance program.


Melissa Proctor is the founder of Miller Proctor Law PLLC, an international trade law firm located in Scottsdale, Arizona. For more than twenty years, she has advised companies on the full of array of international trade issues, imports, exports, embargoes and economic sanctions, anti-corruption compliance, and other agency requirements that impact the cross-border movement of goods, information and services. She may be reached at 480-447-8986 or melissa@millerproctorlaw.com.



[1] See https://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2018/07/284312.htm.

[2] See http://www.military.com/daily-news/2017/07/10/how-north-korea-uses-slave-labor-exports-to-circumvent-sanctions.html

[3] See 31 C.F.R. Part 500 et seq.

[4] See Pub. L. 114-125.

[5] See Pub. L. 115-44.

 

Tags:  exports  imports  North Korea  Regulations  sanctions  Tariff 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

U.S. Import Shipments Targeted by Customs and Border Protection for Suspected North Korean Forced Labor

Posted By Administration, Thursday, December 7, 2017
Updated: Thursday, December 7, 2017


by Melissa Proctor, Miller Proctor Law PLLC


U.S. importers should be aware that U.S. Customs and Border Protection ("CBP") has begun scrutinizing imported goods suspected of being made with North Korean forced labor, as required by the recently enacted Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act ("CAATSA"). CBP appears to be focusing on import shipments from areas in China and Russia bordering on North Korea, and has seized several shipments and issued Requests for Information ("CF-28s") to U.S. importers asking for documentation that proves that no forced North Korean labor was involved in the production of the goods. CBP has also been encouraging parties, who have information about the use of North Korean or forced labor, to submit tips via its online eAllegation portal – such parties may be eligible to receive compensation of up to $250,000. Therefore, U.S. importers should take stock of their current corporate social responsibility policies and procedures with respect to prohibiting the use of forced labor, review the CAATSA requirements, and consider implementing the recommendations for enhanced due diligence by CBP, the U.S. Department of Labor Department, and the International Labour Organization.

CAATSA (H.R. 115-44), which was enacted in August 2017, gave expanded authority to CBP to enforce economic sanctions against North Korea and prevent the entry of goods made with North Korean forced labor into the United States. There have been many reports in the media as of late describing how many manufacturers in China and Russia are using North Korean workers to produce their goods, many of which are being exported to the United States. Based on a report by Military.com1, it is estimated that North Korean slave labor (to the tune of approximately 200,000 persons) is being used in over 45 countries around the world, and that the North Korean government earns an estimated $3 billion annually for supplying slave labor to these countries. All of the wages of foreign workers are paid directly to the North Korean government (or to the companies that they control). The average wage actually received by a North Korean worker, which again is payable to the North Korean government, is reportedly around $400 per month; however, the workers themselves only receive roughly 10% to 20% of that amount. North Korea's export of slave labor around in the world is in addition to the forced labor occurring in the numerous prison labor camps inside North Korea.

By way of background, the Foreign Assets Control Regulations (31 C.F.R. Part 500 et seq), which are enforced by the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC") have for decades prohibited virtually all dealings by U.S. persons with North Korea, and the U.S. Customs Regulations have also long prohibited imports of North Korean-originating goods into the United States – specifically, imported merchandise that contains any amount of North Korean content. In addition, CBP has also denied entry to goods produced, in whole or in part, by prison, forced, child or indentured labor under the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. Section 1307). The Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act ("TFTEA"), which was enacted in 2016, further solidified CBP's enforcement authority in this area, allowing CBP to prohibit the entry of imported goods where there is evidence of forced labor. However, the burden of proving that forced labor was involved in the production of imported goods fell squarely on CBP.

CAATSA, however, changed the rules of the game. Now, when forced labor is suspected, the burden of proof now falls on U.S. importers to show by clear and convincing evidence that North Korean forced labor was not used in the manufacture of their goods. If forced labor is suspected, CBP may issue CF-28s and detain the entry of merchandise. If there is evidence of forced labor, CBP may deny entry and seize the imported goods, subject the goods to forfeiture, assess civil penalties, and even refer the issue for a criminal investigation. U.S. importers caught up in violations of CAATSA should also expect to have their future import shipments scrutinized to much a greater degree, such as through increased examinations and detentions, as well as negative publicity.

In response to a CF-28, U.S. importers may be required to submit documents and records that include certificates of origin, supplier certifications stating that no forced labor was used, supplier daily production records (including subcontractor production records), finishing and packing records, employee timecards and wage records, employee lists, purchase orders and delivery documents for raw materials, inputs and components used, inventory records, bills of material, commercial invoices, packing lists, proof of payment, factory visit reports and photographs, inline and final inspection reports, factory utility bills and payments, etc.

To assist U.S. importers in their increased supply chain due diligence efforts, CBP published guidance on its website recommending the adoption of additional internal controls for compliance, and updated its Reasonable Care Checklist. For example, recommended measures include:

  • Fully understanding the sourcing, manufacturing and finishing processes for their imported goods, identifying all of the companies involved, knowing where such operations are performed, and keeping abreast of the labor conditions in each of the production facilities;
  • Reviewing the information contained on CBP's website relating to Forced Labor, such as fact sheets and recent investigations conducted by CBP;
  • Reviewing the U.S. Labor Department's "List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor" and "Reducing Child Labor and Forced Labor Toolkit," as well as the International Labor Organization's ("ILO's") publication "Indicators of Forced Labour," with respect to high-risk countries, high-risk commodities, and red flags;
  • Performing regular risk assessments and internal audits of their supply chains to confirm that their imported goods are both "forced labor free" and "North Korea free";
  • Implementing a formal, robust process for vetting foreign suppliers and vendors in high-risk areas, and incorporating prohibitions against the use of forced labor in purchase order terms and conditions, supplier agreements and codes of conduct; and,
  • Implementing a formal social corporate responsibility compliance program.

U.S. importers are urged to review the CAATSA requirements and the recommendations of CBP, the Labor Department and the ILO for enhanced internal controls and supply chain due diligence, enhance their written agreements with international supply chain partners (e.g., to include strict prohibitions against the use of forced labor, requirements for maintaining records substantiating that no forced labor is used in the production of goods sold to the U.S. company, agreement to submit to internal audits by the U.S. company, etc.), and expand their current internal audit processes to address potential forced labor issues.

[1] http://www.military.com/daily-news/2017/07/10/how-north-korea-uses-slave-labor-exports-to-circumvent-sanctions.html


Melissa Proctor is the founder of Miller Proctor Law PLLC, an international trade law firm located in Scottsdale, Arizona. For more than twenty years, she has advised companies on the full of array of international trade issues, including export controls, embargoes and economic sanctions, customs laws, anti-corruption compliance, and other agency requirements that impact the cross-border movement of goods, information and services. She may be reached at 480-447-8986 or melissa@millerproctorlaw.com.

CLICK HERE to return to the DECEMBER 2017 RVCF LINK

Tags:  Economic Sanctions  North Korea 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 
          Innovative Retail Technologies EDI Academy